Sex-selective abortions have hit the headlines in a big way
over the last week. There has been outrage in the media over the 'mass murder'
(or so it's been represented) of female foetuses, particularly in some
British-Asian communities. In these groups, the Independent reports, the problem is often so severe that this has
skewed the natural boy-girl ratio of the population.
Many individuals have suggested an initiative to withhold
information about the sex of the child until the 30 week mark where it is no
longer legal to have an abortion. The rest are too incensed to reflect upon
practical solutions to the problem. But, overwhelmingly, a lot of the debate
has massively overlooked how complex this issue is.
Stopping women from knowing the sex of their baby before
it's too late to get an abortion may lead to less girls being aborted purely on
the basis of their sex (obviously a positive), BUT it doesn't get to the root
of the problem.
I'm not against abortion by any means. Modern medical
practices are able to help women who, for whatever reason, aren't ready for or
don't want their baby. That's incredible! Finally, we live in a society that is
able to and willing for us have some control over our own bodies!
Pro-life campaigners seem to be labouring under the illusion
that we should protect life at all costs. It's just illogical. We should be
preserving quality of life, not the sheer quantity it. If a mother doesn't have
the finances, stability and love to provide her child with the upbringing we
would want it to have, why should society bully her into keeping the child?
The mother - that is, the fully conscious human being with
thoughts and memories - should always come before the foetus - who is oblivious
to most things, not least all the problems it is causing. The mother's
wellbeing, her right to control over her own future, and lessening the impact
on her relationships, is the most important factor in any pregnancy.
But back to the topic at hand. If the agency is taken away
from the mother, if it is no longer her own choice to abort her baby but is a
result of pressure from overbearing families, then abortion becomes another
tool for controlling women's bodies against their will.
The problem with those aforementioned, well-intentioned commentators
is that simply prohibiting the disclosure of a baby's sex does not eliminate
the huge cultural stigma surrounding female children. The mother will still
feel inadequate at her 'failure' to provide her husband and family with the son
and grandson that they require, and these families will continue to uphold the
unequal value that they attach to boys and girls.
Since the issue is a cultural one, the best solution is
education. The idea of trying to impose our own ideas and values onto traditional
communities is an unsavoury one, and I
don't have any bright ideas about how to go about such a task. But I think, in
this case and for the sake of progress, that it is a necessary evil.